Child support for unborn children

Quote :

The Republican-led Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for unborn children, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation — Senate Bill 110 — won Senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

Read more

This is getting way too out of hand. Until the child is born, there is no guarantee that there will ever be a baby. Are people this money hungry? Is the far right trying to make their point that a cluster of cells is actually a baby, just like that package of seeds at Walmart are already vegetables and flowers. We are becoming a society of insane ideas and trying to spin them into something reasonable.

What are your thoughts on this?

I think the far right is a bunch of stingy antisocials who absolutely do not want to help anyone, so they dump the whole load on the poor bastard who got this woman pregnant.

While I don't agree with the definition of child or human being this is based on, this isn't a bad idea.
I kind of agree that father should be responsible for share of any expenses from pregnancy, whether or not it results to birth. Including abortion.
Of course, that's from someone living in a country where majority of the expenses are covered by public healthcare.

Kaunisto wrote:

While I don't agree with the definition of child or human being this is based on, this isn't a bad idea.
I kind of agree that father should be responsible for share of any expenses from pregnancy, whether or not it results to birth. Including abortion.
Of course, that's from someone living in a country where majority of the expenses are covered by public healthcare.

If he's lousy then yes let him pay, but if she's lousy and keeps his kid away from him I think it's antisocial to let him pay and they simply do it so they don't have to pay.

Maybe this will curb baby Daddys from multiplying so much and having their babies live off of government money until they're 18?

This country has gone to hell in a handbasket and it's only going to get worse.

Maybe they can trick some random guy to pay for potential unborn kids, eggs.

Jazzy wrote:

Quote :

The Republican-led Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for unborn children, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation — Senate Bill 110 — won Senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

Read more

This is getting way too out of hand. Until the child is born, there is no guarantee that there will ever be a baby.  Are people this money hungry?  Is the far right trying to make their point that a cluster of cells is actually a baby, just like that package of seeds at Walmart are already vegetables and flowers. We are becoming a society of insane ideas and trying to spin them into something reasonable.

What are your thoughts on this?

If the kid doesn't get born he can ask his money back, but not after first paying a few thousand to attorneys with a big chance he won't get it back. She will have to keep the receipts. This was an apple pie for the baby cause I had a craving. No you just wanted to eat it yourself and gave only a tiny bit to the baby and you could have bought it in a cheaper grocery store. I pay 10 percent of the cheapest apple pie.

Messy wrote:

Jazzy wrote:

Quote :

The Republican-led Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for unborn children, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation — Senate Bill 110 — won Senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

Read more

This is getting way too out of hand. Until the child is born, there is no guarantee that there will ever be a baby.  Are people this money hungry?  Is the far right trying to make their point that a cluster of cells is actually a baby, just like that package of seeds at Walmart are already vegetables and flowers. We are becoming a society of insane ideas and trying to spin them into something reasonable.
What are your thoughts on this?

If the kid doesn't get born he can ask his money back, but not after first paying a few thousand to attorneys with a big chance he won't get it back. She will have to keep the receipts. This was an apple pie for the baby cause I had a craving. No you just wanted to eat it yourself and gave only a tiny bit to the baby and you could have bought it in a cheaper grocery store. I pay 10 percent of the cheapest apple pie.

Women need healthcare while pregnant as well as taking neonatal vitamins. Dad's can contribute to paying for these things and it shouldn't all be on the baby momma.

Lämmchen wrote:

Messy wrote:

Jazzy wrote:

Quote :

The Republican-led Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for unborn children, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation — Senate Bill 110 — won Senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

Read more

This is getting way too out of hand. Until the child is born, there is no guarantee that there will ever be a baby.  Are people this money hungry?  Is the far right trying to make their point that a cluster of cells is actually a baby, just like that package of seeds at Walmart are already vegetables and flowers. We are becoming a society of insane ideas and trying to spin them into something reasonable.
What are your thoughts on this?

If the kid doesn't get born he can ask his money back, but not after first paying a few thousand to attorneys with a big chance he won't get it back. She will have to keep the receipts. This was an apple pie for the baby cause I had a craving. No you just wanted to eat it yourself and gave only a tiny bit to the baby and you could have bought it in a cheaper grocery store. I pay 10 percent of the cheapest apple pie.

Women need healthcare while pregnant as well as taking neonatal vitamins. Dad's can contribute to paying for these things and it shouldn't all be on the baby momma.

Oh of course. They have to pay for that in America.
But now already they let the wrong guy pay if a type like you see on that dna show just lies or has no clue who's the dad, so with this that's only going to get worse and lately I read on bored panda that a man wanted a dna test, married, wife didn't cheat, but he didn't trust her and that could kill the unborn child.

It's the world paying the consequences for the fall of the nuclear family.